Alternative Solutions to Big Jay Closure

While debate develops in the backcountry skiing and riding community regarding long term solutions to tree skiing and organization, Big Jay access from Jay Peak is restricted indefinitely. The backcountry skiing and riding community has yet to seriously address the problem other than a local petition and the Big Jay Access Restriction meeting question and answer session . The State of Vermont, the Green Mountain Club, and Jay Peak Resort all agreed to utilize the easiest and quickest short term solution to address the problem of people sliding down the scar and exacerbating the damage. However, there are several alternatives to the closure that could be implemented to address reducing sliding on the scar to near zero.

My suggested alternative solutions should be placed in context of the current situation as dictated to the backcountry skiing and riding community by the decision makers. The fundamental issue is protecting the scar to best allow successful regeneration with the least amount of damage to the environment and the erosion control measures. All solutions should be proposed and thoroughly evaluated with this goal in mind. No single effort will ultimately prove successful including, ironically, a complete restriction of access from Jay Peak Resort.

The community that attended the Big Jay meeting on December 15th was offered no opportunity for partnership, engagement, or participation in the process. The director of Jay Peak Ski Patrol noted that the decision makers were essentially “treating the community like babies.” Without a positive outlet for contribution to making the situation better through collaboration, it seems likely that many members of the community will reject the access restriction this season (proposed without an expected expiration date, essentially an indefinite restriction).

(more…)

Big Jay News & Info from Northern Frontier Section of GMC

The Northern Frontier Section of the Green Mountain Club has two pages dedicated to Big Jay news on their web site. The first page is a collection of articles from various New England media about the cutting. The second link is a collection of articles from Long Trail News, an official publication of the Green Mountain Club. President Richard Windish has somewhat harsh words stating that “We will avenge Big Jay.” Whether this should be meant to suggest punishing the two individuals responsible for the cutting or something in a more broader scope is not clarified.

CTA Newsletter Weighs in on Big Jay Issue

Vermont’s Catamont Trail Association’s latest newsletter contains an article by Peter Wadsworth, a Green Mountain Club Volunteer, about the cutting on Big Jay. The article on page 9 of the winter 2007-2008 Catamount Trail News considers the negative impact of public perception on the backcountry skiing community. This topic is of great concern to downhill backcountry and slackcountry skiers that were dismayed and appalled by the Big Jay cutting. It should come as no surprise that nordic and touring skiers also want to distance themselves from the cut on Big Jay. The article is welcoming of downhill backcountry skiers into organizations like the CTA and suggests that partnership and education are needed tools to ensure this type of destruction does not occur again.

Atkinson Calls Out the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” Policy

Author and Sugarbush local John Atkinson weighs in on the Big Jay incident and the need for organization and legal tree line creation and maintenance in the October edition Vermont Sports Online. Atkinson specifically addresses the current unspoken code of “don’t ask, don’t tell” that specificies not using chain saws or other intrusive cutting methods and relying on discovery or being shown secret tree shots. Atkinson suggests that this current unspoken code is tacit approval of illegal operations and draws a direct relationship between such tacit approval and the Big Jay cut.

It is highly unlikely that the backcountry and slackcountry tree skiing and riding population will stop skiing illegally maintained lines to make a point of solidarity for organized and legal efforts and in objection to the Big Jay cut which most have vehemently denounced. The article suggests opting for legal and legitimate tree line maintenance options until the community can organize and follow in the paths of other recreational pursuits such as mountain biking and snowmobiling which work closely with both state and national forest services.

Online Chatter About Big Jay and BC Organization

Internet forums have been buzzing with chatter regarding the recent closure of Big Jay and the need for organization within the eastern backcountry community. The Big Jay cut and subsequent closure has been a catalyst for discussion on an issue that most skiers and riders would have dismissed out of hand previously. Organization could lead to public knowledge of hidden stashes and a reduction of cutting illegal lines. But it could also pave the way for legitimizing eastern backcountry/sidecountry tree skiing and allow for legal maintenance of official trees and perhaps some new lines to be cut legally.

Here are links to online forums that have sprouted discussion of the Big Jay issue along with discussion about the legality of tree lines and backcountry organization in general. Interestingly enough, almost without exception the entire skiing community (both backcountry and lift serviced) have come out strongly against the illegal cut (even those backcountry skiers that partake in skiing glades thinned out illegally). Green Mountain Club and the State of Vermont should take note that extremely few skiers and riders think this scar is a good thing. The threads from Time For Tuckerman and Telemark Talk entitled “BC Access…. Is this the time to organize in the Northeast?” are especially insightful.

AlpineZone.com Forums

First Tracks!! Online Ski Magazine

NELSAP Discussion on Snow Journal

SkiVT-L

Telemark Talk

Teton Gravity Research

Time for Tuckerman